I'm good with Shawn moving the face detection in to the next version if that makes development easier/cleaner. Hope you're feeling better.<div><br></div><div>Not much to report on from me other than talks are continuing with IBA (Nathan and Harlo were also on that call). Also since Sam and I (Nathan too?) are going to Access Now conference in SF in couple weeks, is there anyone we should try to talk to while we're out there, other than having a beer with Derek?</div>
<div><br></div><div>-b </div><div><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Nathan of Guardian <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nathan@guardianproject.info">nathan@guardianproject.info</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">On 10/11/2011 03:13 PM, Shawn Van Every wrote:<br>
> With regards to the NOT DONE item in the video prototype, I was under the impression that it would be a better use of time to work on the next version rather than try to jam face detection into that proof of concept. If I am wrong, let me know and I'll do it.<br>
<br>
</div>As long as Bryan agrees to that (moving face detection into this phase<br>
of work), then I can move it to Phase II.<br>
<br>
Harlo and I are working to finish up Phase I ObscuraCam update,<br>
including the cosnent/intent feature, and debugging the native code on<br>
the awesome/yet annoying Samsung line of devices!<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
+nathan<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Bryan Nunez<br>Technology Manager<br>WITNESS<br>
</div>