[guardian-dev] libotr for gibberbot?

Miron c1.android at niftybox.net
Fri Nov 11 21:20:05 EST 2011


On 11-11-11 01:58 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>
>> On 11/11/2011 12:36 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> Its looking more and more like libotr is a good central point for us to be working on for handling improvements related to OTR.  For example, if it turns out to be a solid idea, I will be implementing OTR keys being integrated into OpenPGP keys.  That would happen in libotr for Pidgin and Adium.  I could either spend the time to reimplement that in Java, or make JNI wrappers for libotr and use gpgme-for-java.  The second approach would then also give us a fully functional OpenPGP stack versus the limited one in APG.  It would also give us the Socialist Millionaires Protocol, implemented in libotr 3.2.
>>>
>>> Anyone have any counterpoints to switching Gibberbot to libotr?
>>>
>> Memory corruption bugs! Unless you mean the libotr in Java?
>>
>> Please consider a full re-implementation of OTR in a type safe language
>> rather than simply switching to native code or code written by the OTR
>> team; we should try to avoid a privacy software monoculture.
>>
>> Check this out:
>> https://github.com/afflux/pure-python-otr
>>
>> All the best,
>> Jake
> I wish we could use python, but that's not an option for this project.  A full Java implementation of OTR would also be good to have, but it seems that I would then spend my project time on that, and not on improving the usefulness of OTR, which is the scope of this project (PSST: https://guardianproject.info/wiki/PSST).  If someone wanted to implement the Socialist Millionaires Protocol in otr4j, I'd gladly use it.  

I can take this on.


-- 
Miron
http://hyper.to/blog/


More information about the Guardian-dev mailing list