[guardian-dev] Proposal: Public Jenkins

Mark Belinsky m at markbelinsky.com
Fri Apr 12 17:33:09 EDT 2013


What about setting up the wall display plugin or something similar and have
that gui be publicly accessible?

~Sent from my mobile. Please excuse any typos or terseness.
On Apr 12, 2013 3:32 PM, "Hans-Christoph Steiner" <hans at guardianproject.info>
wrote:

>
> I've been runing quite a few jenkins instances for a while for puredata.  I
> find that jenkins can be quite fragile with slaves in the setup.  Since
> this
> will be something like a jenkins slave, I would not be surprised if it was
> also fragile.
>
> .hc
>
> On 04/12/2013 03:01 PM, Abel Luck wrote:
> > Once it is setup all the info from our private Jenkins will be mirrored
> > to the public one. Including the addition of new projects etc.
> >
> > So, the only ongoing maintenance required is when Jenkins plugin updates
> > happen, we need to update them on the public and private instances.
> >
> > ~abel
> >
> > Hans of Guardian:
> >>
> >> I like this idea as long as it doesn't require much maintenance.  It
> provides another stream of useful data to our redmine, so it really can
> become THE central repo of info on project progress.
> >>
> >> .hc
> >>
> >> On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Abel Luck wrote:
> >>
> >>> Heya,
> >>>
> >>> So our desire to be full paranoid wrt the build server is of course
> >>> justified, but conflicts up against our desire to be transparent in
> >>> our processes as well.
> >>>
> >>> None of the info in Jenkins is confidential, it's just sensitive, we
> >>> only want approved peeps to be able to edit it.
> >>>
> >>> There's no reason the info couldn't be exposed to the world read-only.
> >>>
> >>> Of course we don't want to expose the secure Jenkins publicly as that
> is
> >>> a huge attack surface.
> >>>
> >>> However, there is a plugin called Build Publisher Plugin
> >>>
> >>> "This plugin allows records from one Jenkins to be published on another
> >>> Jenkins. The typical use case is for you to run builds within the
> >>> firewall, then send the results to another Jenkins which is facing the
> >>> outside world. "
> >>>
> >>> Proposal:
> >>> We run a public jenkins instance on the dev.gp.i box, that slurps up
> >>> data from the private secure jenkins.
> >>>
> >>> We could then also integrate jenkins with redmine [2], which will make
> >>> dev.guardianproject.info the foci of our development effors.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> ~abel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1]:
> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Build+Publisher+Plugin
> >>> [2]: http://www.r-labs.org/projects/r-labs/wiki/Hudson_En
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Guardian-dev mailing list
> >>>
> >>> Post: Guardian-dev at lists.mayfirst.org
> >>> List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/guardian-dev
> >>>
> >>> To Unsubscribe
> >>>        Send email to:  Guardian-dev-unsubscribe at lists.mayfirst.org
> >>>        Or visit:
> https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/options/guardian-dev/hans%40guardianproject.info
> >>>
> >>> You are subscribed as: hans at guardianproject.info
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Guardian-dev mailing list
>
> Post: Guardian-dev at lists.mayfirst.org
> List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/guardian-dev
>
> To Unsubscribe
>         Send email to:  Guardian-dev-unsubscribe at lists.mayfirst.org
>         Or visit:
> https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/options/guardian-dev/mark%40guardianproject.info
>
> You are subscribed as: mark at guardianproject.info
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mayfirst.org/pipermail/guardian-dev/attachments/20130412/d18586e6/attachment.html>


More information about the Guardian-dev mailing list