[guardian-dev] OTR4j and OTRv3
abel at guardianproject.info
Thu Jan 10 06:59:48 EST 2013
> On 13-01-09 03:33 PM, Abel Luck wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>> What's the status of the OTRv3 implementation in OTR4j?
>> The two main improvements are two improvements we totally need!
>> 1. When logged in from multiple spots (e.g., laptop and gibberbot), they
>> no longer fight for control of the OTR session
> We need to implement this. It allows multiple OTR connections to each
> of the peer's presences. It has an impact on UI. We should either:
> * Add a UI element choosing the remote presence to talk to, or:
> * Send outgoing messages to all presences
> I personally think the first choice will work out better, especially in
> a mobile environment. I'm estimating 20-40 hours of work.
Ella ^ hear that?
> I have updated: https://dev.guardianproject.info/issues/331
>> 2. TLV type 8 - arbitrary encrypted data! (for file sharing, encrypted
>> voice, etc)
> This is actually pretty easy to implement in otr4j. The more
> interesting part is implementing apps on top of it. I have high hopes
> for something like:
Do you have an estimate for how long to implement TLV type 8 support in
>> Eleanor mentioned that OpenITP's next funding round is coming up soon
>> and this would be a great candidate for a feature bounty.
>> Any chance the OTR4j team would be interested in this?
> I think the heavy lifting is more on the Gibberbot side, but having
> someone design a clean API extension to otr4j will help.
Hm, I didn't expect this. I figured there would be lots of work
required on the OTR4j side before GB got around to making use of the new
More information about the Guardian-dev