[guardian-dev] Makefile patch for Orbot

[Nathan of Guardian]

Merged - thanks again!

commit 8b5bb041d1ffc02bee113c71d81fadf06d9a0c99
Author: Michael Rogers <michael at briarproject.org>
Date:   Fri Jun 6 15:10:48 2014 +0100

    Makefile patch for Orbot
   
    Signed-off-by: Nathan Freitas <nathan at freitas.net>



On 06/06/2014 11:14 AM, Nathan Freitas wrote:
>
>
> On June 6, 2014 10:10:48 AM EDT, Michael Rogers
<michael at briarproject.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find attached a small patch for Orbot's external/Makefile,
> allowing Tor to run on Android versions older than API 9. This fixes
> the problem I previously reported about Tor dying with exit code 255
> on API 7.
>
> With this patch we can build Briar's Tor binary straight from the
> Orbot source tree. Thanks so much for all the work you've done to
> bring Tor to Android! Now let's all switch to Orchid. ;-)
>
> > Been working on that, though early results are not so promising in
> terms of performance and memory usage.
>
>
> I ran into a small hitch while testing this patch: building iptables
> requires pkg-config, otherwise I get the following error (which Nathan
> previously ran into, I disovered while searching for the cause):
>
> "
> configure: WARNING: linux/proc_fs.h: present but cannot be compiled
> configure: WARNING: linux/proc_fs.h:     check for missing
> prerequisite headers?
> configure: WARNING: linux/proc_fs.h: see the Autoconf documentation
> configure: WARNING: linux/proc_fs.h:     section "Present But Cannot
> Be Compiled"
> configure: WARNING: linux/proc_fs.h: proceeding with the compiler's
> result
> checking for linux/proc_fs.h... no
> ./configure: line 12015: syntax error near unexpected token
> `libnetfilter_conntrack,'
> ./configure: line 12015: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(libnetfilter_conntrack,
> libnetfilter_conntrack >= 1.0.4,'
> make: *** [iptables/Makefile] Error 2
> "
>
> The BUILD file should probably mention pkg-config as a prerequisite.
>
> Incidentally, the submodules for libevent and OpenSSL are still
> pointing at 2.0.9-rc and 1.0.1g, respectively - should they be updated?
>
> > Yes... I have been having an issue with my git setup and submodules.
> Will figure it out today.
>
> > Thanks for the patch!
>
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Guardian-dev mailing list
>>
>> Post: Guardian-dev at lists.mayfirst.org
>> List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/guardian-dev
>>
>> To Unsubscribe
>>        Send email to:  Guardian-dev-unsubscribe at lists.mayfirst.org
>> Or visit:
>>
https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/options/guardian-dev/nathan%40guardianproject.info
>>
>> You are subscribed as: nathan at guardianproject.info
>
> _______________________________________________
> Guardian-dev mailing list
>
> Post: Guardian-dev at lists.mayfirst.org
> List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/guardian-dev
>
> To Unsubscribe
>         Send email to:  Guardian-dev-unsubscribe at lists.mayfirst.org
>         Or visit:
https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/options/guardian-dev/nathan%40guardianproject.info
>
> You are subscribed as: nathan at guardianproject.info