From editor at unionsforsinglepayerhealthcare.org Wed Apr 3 16:19:39 2019 From: editor at unionsforsinglepayerhealthcare.org (Single Payer News Editor) Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 16:19:39 -0400 Subject: WSLC President Larry Brown, "Let's take health care off the bargaining table" Message-ID: <0047af513fe5e0e6d8820de895215acc@unionsforsinglepayerhealthcare.org> Larry Brown has served as legislative and political director for Machinists (IAM) District Council 751 since 2006. He is currently President of the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO. The WSLC is the state's largest union organization, representing the interests of some 600 locals and councils with approximately 550,000 rank-and-file members working in Washington state. The article is reprinted from The Stand [1], a service of the WSLC and its affiliated unions. (To see how Canadian unions took healthcare "off the bargaining table" check out this video [2].) http://www.thestand.org/2019/03/lets-take-health-care-off-the-bargaining-table/?fbclid=IwAR2Uo9MB0Nr0wCHUWHfHfsl6_ygJ2fgb1M4JsyIzDl2qDM-mEe0k4En3xAk [3] LET?S TAKE HEALTH CARE OFF THE BARGAINING TABLE [4] BY LARRY BROWN ------------------------- (March 5, 2019) -- Union members enjoy some of the best health care that working-class Americans can expect to receive. Unions have fought long and hard to establish and maintain these benefits and they are justly proud of their achievements. In the absence of a national health plan, they have sacrificed much to negotiate a modicum of security for their members and their families. More than half of all Americans still access health care through employment-based benefit plans. There is a myth that Americans love their health plans and want to preserve them at all costs. But providing an important public good like health care as a benefit linked to employment rather than as a right available to all is an accident of history. This linkage is not only a bad idea, it is also simply unsustainable. No other advanced industrialized country links health care to employment like the U.S. does. [5]Workers in other countries don't have to fear losing their health care when they lose their jobs, nor are they chained to a job that they hate because they need the health care coverage. They don't have to worry about their children aging out of their health plans or of losing their benefits as a result of a long-term illness that disrupts their employment. They are not subject to the constant churning of health plans and provider networks and the confusing and ever-changing array of deductibles, co-payments, out-of-network charges that even the best of plans impose on their members. And importantly, these employer-based health care plans put American companies at a competitive disadvantage against rival businesses in other countries that have national or single-payer health care systems. The Milliman Medical Index [6] reports that total health care costs for a family of four with decent employer-provided coverage exceed $28,000 per year. This comes to $14 per hour worked by a full-time employee. The average employer pays nearly $16,000 towards those costs and the worker picks up the remaining $12,000 through a combination of payroll deductions, co-pays and deductibles. The total costs have consistently increased 2, 3 and 4 times faster than the rate of inflation. And the percentage paid by the worker has gone up nearly every year since 1994. That is why health care has become the biggest cause of strikes, lockouts and concession bargaining. Health care costs drive wage stagnation as unions routinely trade off wage increases and other benefits in order to maintain basic health care for their members and retirees. Unscrupulous non-union employers gain an unfair competitive advantage over worker-friendly businesses by shortchanging their own employees' health care benefits. Unions do not serve their members well by trying to circle the wagons around an unsustainable model of employment-based health care. That is why the AFL-CIO, the Washington State Labor Council, and dozens of unions have called for a social insurance model like Medicare for All [7]. The time has come to take health care off the bargaining table by making it a right for all Americans. ------------------------- _LARRY BROWN IS PRESIDENT OF THE WASHINGTON STATE LABOR COUNCIL, AFL-CIO. The WSLC is the state's largest union organization, representing the interests of some 600 locals and councils with approximately 550,000 rank-and-file members working in Washington state. Learn more at www.wslc.org [8]._ SHORT URL: http://www.thestand.org/?p=74499 ________________ Distributed by: Kay Tillow, Coordinator All Unions Committee for Single Payer Health Care--HR 676 [9] P. O. Box 17595 Louisville, KY 40217 (502) 636 1551 Email: [10]nursenpo at aol.com http://unionsforsinglepayer.org [9] https://www.facebook.com/unionsforsinglepayer [11] Links: ------ [1] http://www.thestand.org/about/ [2] https://vimeo.com/254711983 [3] http://www.thestand.org/2019/03/lets-take-health-care-off-the-bargaining-table/?fbclid=IwAR2Uo9MB0Nr0wCHUWHfHfsl6_ygJ2fgb1M4JsyIzDl2qDM-mEe0k4En3xAk [4] http://www.thestand.org/2019/03/lets-take-health-care-off-the-bargaining-table/?fbclid=IwAR2Uo9MB0Nr0wCHUWHfHfsl6_ygJ2fgb1M4JsyIzDl2qDM-mEe0k4En3xAk# [5] http://www.thestand.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/health-care-money.jpg [6] http://www.milliman.com/uploadedFiles/insight/Periodicals/mmi/2018-milliman-medical-index.pdf [7] http://www.wslc.org/2017-wslc-resolutions/#26 [8] http://www.wslc.org/ [9] http://unionsforsinglepayer.org [10] http://mce_host/roundcube/nursenpo at aol.com [11] https://www.facebook.com/unionsforsinglepayer -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From editor at unionsforsinglepayerhealthcare.org Thu Apr 25 17:38:48 2019 From: editor at unionsforsinglepayerhealthcare.org (Single Payer News Editor) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 17:38:48 -0400 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?America=E2=80=99s=20Biggest=20Lie=3A=20We=20Can?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=99t=20Afford=20Medicare=20for=20All?= Message-ID: The article below by Les Leopold is reprinted from Common Dreams. Please circulate it widely. Then watch the hearing in the House Rules Committee on the Medicare for All Act of 2019 on Tuesday, April 30, 2019, at 10 am. You can watch it live on the Rules Committee website. https://rules.house.gov/ [1] https://www.commondreams.org/views/2019/04/23/americas-biggest-lie-we-cant-afford-medicare-all?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=email_this [2] Tuesday, April 23, 2019 by Common Dreams [3] AMERICA?S BIGGEST LIE: WE CAN?T AFFORD MEDICARE FOR ALL Think about how much your income would go up if you didn't have to pay for healthcare at all. That would begin to close the gap between productivity and wages for the first time in a generation. By Les Leopold [4] _A patient is treated for the flu in Louisiana. Healthcare costs in the U.S. were found to be twice as high as those in ten other developed countries because of high prices across the healthcare industry--from doctor's salaries to prescription drugs. (Photo: Mario Villafuerte/Getty Images)_ Pundits and politicians repeatedly warn us that the country cannot afford costly social services. They caution about the perils of a rising national debt, the supposed near bankruptcy of Medicare and Social Security, and the need to sell public services to the highest bidder in order to save them. We must tighten our belts sooner or later, they tell us, rather than spend on social goods like universal health care, free higher education and badly needed infrastructure. To many Americans this sounds all too true because they are having an incredibly tough time making ends meet. According to the Federal Reserve, [5] "Four in 10 adults in 2017 would either borrow, sell something, or not be able pay if faced with a $400 emergency expense." To those who are so highly stressed financially, the idea of paying for a costly program like Medicare for All sounds impossible. "The point is to give Americans what they have been long denied - high quality universal healthcare AND a real wage increase by providing Medicare for All with no co-pays, no deductibles and no premiums." We are the richest country in the history of the world, however, and certainly could afford vastly expanded and improved vital public services if we had the will. What stands in the way is runaway inequality [6]. Our nation's wealth has been hijacked by the super-rich, with plenty of aid from their paid-for politicians. Over the past 40 years the top fraction of the top one percent have systematically denied working people the fruits of their enormous productivity. The results of this wage theft can be seen clearly in the chart below which tracks productivity (output per hour of labor) and average weekly wages (after accounting for inflation) of non-supervisory and production workers (about 85 percent of the workforce). The red line shows the rise of American productivity since WWII. While not a perfect measurement of the power of our economy, it does capture our overall level of knowledge, technical skills, worker effort, management systems, and technology. Ever-rising productivity is the key to the wealth of nations. As we can see clearly, the productivity trend has been ever upward. Today the average worker is nearly three times as productive per hour of labor as he or she was at the end of WWII. And the workforce is more than three times as large. That means we are a colossal economic powerhouse. But unless you are an economic elite, it doesn't feel that way. To understand why we need to look at the blue line - average real worker wages. From WWII to the late 1970s or so, as productivity rose so did the average real wage of nearly all American workers. Year by year most working people saw their standard of living rise. For every one percent increase in productivity, about two-thirds went to labor, and the remaining one-third went to capital investment and profits. After the late 1970s, however, the story changes dramatically. Real wages stall for more than 40 years, while productivity continues to climb. Had wages and productivity continued to rise in tandem, the average weekly earnings of the American worker would be almost double what it is today, rising from today's average of $746 per week to $1,377 per week. WHAT HAPPENED? WHERE DID ALL THE MONEY GO THAT ONCE WENT TO WORKING PEOPLE? The fatalistic story sold to us by elite-funded think tanks is that the rise of international competition and the introduction of advanced technology crushed the wages of those without the highest skill levels. The typical worker, it is claimed, is now competing with cheap labor from around the world and hence sees his or her wages stall and even decline. And since there really isn't much anyone can do about globalization or automation, there's nothing we can do about the stalling wages. Such a convenient story to justify runaway inequality! "So next time you hear someone say we can't afford a public good, that we need to tighten our belts and get used to austerity, think about all that wealth that has flowed to the very top." The real story is far more complex and troubling. Yes, globalization and automation contribute to stagnant wages. But as the International Labor Organization shows in their remarkable 2012 study [7], only about 30 percent of this wage stagnation can be attributed to technology and globalization. The main cause is the neo-liberal policy agenda of deregulation of finance, cuts in social spending and attacks on labor unions. And within that mix the biggest driver of wage stagnation can be attributed to financialization - the deregulation of Wall Street which permitted -- for the first time since the Great Depression -- the rapacious financial strip-mining of workers, students, families and communities. Put simply, the neo-liberal model ushered in by Thatcher and Reagan, and then intensified by Clinton and Blair, moved the wealth that once flowed to working people to financial and corporate elites. (For a more thorough account see Professor William Lazonick's "Profits without Prosperity." [8] ) HOW MUCH MONEY ARE WE LOSING? ?? More than we can imagine. Here's a back-of-the-envelope estimate for just the most recent year on the chart, 2017: The gap between the productivity wage and the current average wage is $631 per week. That is, if the average weekly wage continued to rise with productivity, it would be $631 higher than the current average wage. In 2017, there are 103 million of these workers. So the total amount of "lost" wages that flowed to economic elites is a whopping $3.4 trillion! (103 million x $631 x 52 weeks) And that's just for one year. HERE?S HOW TO PAY FOR MEDICARE FOR ALL Current estimates for a single payer system come in at about $3 trillion per year. Americans already are paying $1.9 trillion in payroll and income taxes that go to Medicare, Medicaid and other government health programs. So, we would need to raise another $1.1 trillion to provide universal healthcare and prescription drugs with no co-pays, no deductibles and no premiums. In the name of fairness, that additional $1.1 trillion to pay for Medicare for All should be raised by taxing back a portion of the $3.4 trillion in wealth that has flowed to the super rich instead of to working people. After all, working people have not had a real wage increase in more than forty years as economic elites have siphoned away tens of trillions of dollars of income that once went to working people, (the gap between the two lines). Wouldn't it be more than fair to ask the superrich to pay the $1.1 trillion needed for Medicare for All? There are numerous ways for these economic elites pay their fair share: * Financial transaction tax on stock, bond and derivative transactions; * Wealth tax on those with over $50 million in wealth; * Minimum corporate tax of 35 percent on all corporations with over $100 million in profits who now pay little or nothing like Amazon did this past year; * Raise the marginal tax bracket to 70% on all income over $10 million per year; * Increase the inheritance tax on the super-rich to prevent the creation of a permanent oligarchy?and so on. The point is to give Americans what they have been long denied - high quality universal healthcare AND a real wage increase by providing Medicare for All with no co-pays, no deductibles and no premiums. Think about how much your income would go up if you didn't have to pay for healthcare at all. That would begin to close the gap between productivity and wages for the first time in a generation. WAIT! SHOULDN?T WORKING PEOPLE PAY SOMETHING FOR HEALTH CARE COVERAGE? We already are. We pay payroll taxes for Medicare and a portion of our regular taxes go to fund Medicaid and other public health programs for veterans, Native Americans and public health-related research and regulation. So next time you hear someone say we can't afford a public good, that we need to tighten our belts and get used to austerity, think about all that wealth that has flowed to the very top. Think about that big fat gap between productivity and real wages. Think about how runaway inequality has allowed the wealth of the richest nation in history to be hijacked by the super-rich. It's time the American people got a real wage increase and Medicare for All would deliver just that. ___________ Distributed by: Kay Tillow, Coordinator All Unions Committee for Single Payer Health Care--HR 676 [9] P. O. Box 17595 Louisville, KY 40217 (502) 636 1551 Email: [10]nursenpo at aol.com http://unionsforsinglepayer.org [9] https://www.facebook.com/unionsforsinglepayer [11] 04/25/2019 Links: ------ [1] https://rules.house.gov/ [2] https://www.commondreams.org/views/2019/04/23/americas-biggest-lie-we-cant-afford-medicare-all?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=email_this [3] https://www.commondreams.org [4] https://www.commondreams.org/author/les-leopold [5] https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/2018-economic-well-being-of-us-households-in-2017-dealing-with-unexpected-expenses.htm [6] https://runawayinequality.org/ [7] https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_194843.pdf [8] https://hbr.org/2014/09/profits-without-prosperity [9] http://unionsforsinglepayer.org [10] http://mce_host/roundcube/nursenpo at aol.com [11] https://www.facebook.com/unionsforsinglepayer -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cb1e528f.png Type: image/png Size: 436245 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 118a8576.png Type: image/png Size: 34751 bytes Desc: not available URL: