[Ssc-dev] SSC planning questions
Bryan Nunez
bryan at witness.org
Tue Oct 2 13:12:09 EDT 2012
Hey Nathan,
No worries, thanks for the update, it's very helpful. Now that we've got
funding and deadlines, I figure we need to be a little more systematic with
how we're doing things.
Thanks,
Bryan
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Nathan of Guardian <
nathan at guardianproject.info> wrote:
> On 09/28/2012 12:30 AM, Bryan Nunez wrote:
> > over the next 2 years. Nathan, do you have time to talk between now and
> > Monday about the following?
>
> Sorry I missed this. My brother was in town visiting, and all my time
> just evaporated. Swoosh!
>
> > 1. Goals FY13 + FY14 (outcome: clear outputs in terns of adoption,
> referece
> > design, user testing + clarity on end point)
>
> We've been dividing our efforts at Guardian into three categories:
>
> - core/end-user apps (aka Orbot or ObscuraCam)
>
> - platform / developer tools (android-ffmpeg with redact/privacy
> filters, iocipher/sqlcipher/gpg)... also the J3M format efforts!
>
> - applied partner solutions (aka InformaCam effort with IBA)
>
> It might be useful to start thinking of our overall SSC efforts within
> these 3 categories as well.
>
> > 2. Budget needed (outcome: exact understanding of the budget needed and
> how
> > much of that $$, if any is covered by from Guardian).
>
> Yes, this is an important point, as we have a pretty diverse (and
> growing!) set of funding right now that will ultimately help work on
> SSC/Obsc/Informa. This is our "platform" efforts, and ask an example, a
> huge amount of work is being funded by RFA and FPU now, as you know.
>
> > 3. Development and activities (outcome: detailed workplan and timing on
> > development, outreach/distribution/user testing etc.)
>
> Rosa will be helpful in getting this done, with input from Harlo and
> myself, or whoever else is obviously interested.
>
> > 4. Current + future funding request status, more internal to WITNESS but
> if
> > we can review what funding you guys have that might be going into SSC
> > development either directly or indirectly (outcome: exact clarity on what
>
> Right> See my comments on #2 but understand this is a different question
> as well.
>
> +n
>
>
--
Bryan Nunez
Technology Manager
WITNESS
+1 (718) 783-2000 x-311
GPG ID: 54E3286C7C631254
GPG Fingerprint: 6115 6A41 0F5A 9AA0 67B6 79D8 54E3 286C 7C63 1254
Check out our new Human Rights Channel <http://www.youtube.com/humanrights> on
YouTube
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mayfirst.org/pipermail/ssc-dev/attachments/20121002/f39d87b0/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ssc-dev
mailing list