[Ssc-dev] lat long order in j3m

[Harlo Holmes]

Actually, the order is Lon, Lat, to conform to GeoJSON standards (which is
required by Elasticsearch.)

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:52 AM, David Oliver <david at guardianproject.info>
wrote:

> Agreed - the order is LAT, LONG
>
> more info: http://www.geomidpoint.com/latlon.html
>
>
>
> David M. Oliver | david at g <david at olivercoady.com>uardianproject.info |
> http://g <http://olivercoady.com>uardianproject.info | @davidmoliver | +1
> 970 368 2366
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Svetlana Chirkova <schirkova at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys, just wanted to confirm that standard/convention of gps
>> coordinates ordering (lat,lon vs lon,lat)
>>
>> i always thought it was lat, lon (
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7309121/preferred-order-of-writing-latitude-longitude-tuples
>> )
>>
>> but j3m is lon,lat at the moment.
>>
>> just wanted to confirm that:
>> - it's suppuposed to be 'long,lat'
>> - j3m will continie to be 'long,lat'
>>
>> ?
>>
>> where am i...
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ssc-dev mailing list
>>
>> Post: Ssc-dev at lists.mayfirst.org
>> List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc-dev
>>
>> To Unsubscribe
>>         Send email to:  Ssc-dev-unsubscribe at lists.mayfirst.org
>>         Or visit:
>> https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/options/ssc-dev/david%40guardianproject.info
>>
>> You are subscribed as: david at guardianproject.info
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ssc-dev mailing list
>
> Post: Ssc-dev at lists.mayfirst.org
> List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc-dev
>
> To Unsubscribe
>         Send email to:  Ssc-dev-unsubscribe at lists.mayfirst.org
>         Or visit:
> https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/options/ssc-dev/harlo.holmes%40gmail.com
>
> You are subscribed as: harlo.holmes at gmail.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mayfirst.org/pipermail/ssc-dev/attachments/20141030/b61b5017/attachment.html>