[Ssc-dev] Authentication, Authorization and Architecture

[barbra]

oh, and sorry everyone for almost bumping us off course

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:45 PM, barbra <blmack at gmail.com> wrote:

> Its a good thing then that most of the work lee and I did on this was this
> email :-)
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Nathan of Guardian <
> nathan at guardianproject.info> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Lee Azzarello <lee at rockingtiger.com> wrote:
>>
>> >I didn't have any information about the budgets for individual
>> >clients. I thought InformaCam got a $400k grant from the Knight
>> >Foundation.
>>
>> $300k and only a portion of that is direct development (as opposed to
>> deployment, training, partnerships, etc).
>>
>> More importantly what the IBA is asking for is custom functionality
>> outside the scope of core InformaCam as funded by Knight.
>>
>> Funding for IBA variants have come from them directly, but it does seem
>> to me that this beyond any amount of grant that we have received.
>>
>>
>> +n
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ssc-dev mailing list
>>
>> Post: Ssc-dev at lists.mayfirst.org
>> List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/ssc-dev
>>
>> To Unsubscribe
>>         Send email to:  Ssc-dev-unsubscribe at lists.mayfirst.org
>>         Or visit:
>> https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/options/ssc-dev/blmack%40gmail.com
>>
>> You are subscribed as: blmack at gmail.com
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mayfirst.org/pipermail/ssc-dev/attachments/20130307/526ec8c8/attachment-0001.html>